Category Archives: Europe in Mind

Cognitive Strategies in Political Communication

Everybody knows, what everybody wants: a high turnout in the UK elections. And all that it took was a TV debate between leaders of the three parties; The conservative on the right, labour on the left and somewhere in between the element of Change, Hope and Unity. But this time it was not the Internet but TV that makes the election a success for everybody. A live TV debate, like the one in 2010, was never done in the nation where the industrial Revolution first took shape. In comparison, the first live TV debate in the US was in 1960. 50 years after Obama’s ancestors learned to utilize this new tool for the purpose of political communication, the old world is realizing its potential to mobilize a somewhat indifferent public. But did they use it right? And can the Obama Campaign be replicated in Europe?
We honestly don’t know this yet. It has not been tried. But we know what does not work; Issues! No candidate will win with issues. They are to complicated to communicate and to boring to discuss. Some issues are only relevant to a small target group others are irrelevant for another. Everybody has to try this himself for a moment. It is really hard. Try to do an research on a topic like tax reform or public spending. I admit that some people might think its exciting and motivating. But most people agree that it sounds rather boring and dry. Maybe its because we made it in the past sound boring and dry. One could make this little thought experiment for a moment. Lets imagine that such a research task is charged with positive emotions like joy and excitement. Would such emotions make us want to do them more? Maybe, but it would involve the same tasks and methods like it does in the real world. In our imagination we can associate these tasks with a positive vibe but it would not make them objectively more fun. So, whatever we think we feel is mainly the result of emotional conditioning in a social and cultural setting. And it says nothing about the fruit earned by the labour pursuit. No political campaign adviser would tell his client that issues are what the public demands. Motive researchers present opinion poll after one another concluding that “values” are what people want. That these polls are hardly criticized in the press is not surprising. There is some truth in them, namely that it is cost effective to activate the right emotional buttons to stimulate the desired response. It is plainly cheaper, the cost per vote decreases immensely when pushing the emotional button. When the campaign is a head race instead of a ‘programmed winner’ rushes in a short election campaign a landslide victory. Obama has proven this successfully. There are also the opposite examples. Not successful was the elections for the European Parliament. Their focus on issues is almost pathetic given the additional constraints campaigns on european level suffer. For example language and the little prerequisite knowledge of EU institutions in general. But also the public opinion that considers the EU institutions irrelevant to their daily life.

What does work is a clear focus on the candidate’s values. They are easy to communicate and everybody can relate to them quiet naturally. They mean something to people and they are quiet literally simply pretty. But lets go back now to the UK elections. The campaign turned around during the live TV debate when all major Newspapers (from left to right: Daily Mirror, The Guardian, Daily Telegraph, Daily Express, The SUN, The Times, Daily Mail) featured Nick Clegg in Obama style on their front pages. Not the internet, not social networks, youtube, facebook and all that made Obama the president in 2008, but the TV image that showed millions of people in the UK for the first time since the late 70s, a third candidate captivated also the print industry.

We have to face it, right now and right here. Democracy is like a supermarket. And your votes are your Pounds. And whoever will win tonight, it is payed by the Brits. And they can say thank you BBC. It was a real pleasure to remind us that public broadcasting is not loosing its capacity to mobilize and activate in the name of Hope, Unity and Peace.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Europe in Mind

Communicating Europe and to Citizens: Evaluation Report

Bringing Europe closer to its citizens is the aim of Europe’s Communication Strategy. It is not a legal obligation on part of any European Institution to communicate its activities to citizens. Apart from the European Parliament which as the only elected body in the political triangle of Commission-Council-Parliament, the Commission took the first step towards a Communication Strategy vis a vi the public in 2005 after the negative votes in France and the Netherlands on the European Constitution. The Treaty of Maastricht aimed for more than just a single European market and created the need to “fill the gap” between citizens and european decision makers on what is called Communication.

“Not as a rescue operation for the constitution, but to stimulate a wider debate between the European Union’s democratic institutions and citizens”, a Plan D – Democracy, Dialogue and Debate, under Margot Wallstroem, was initiated to respond to this need and other identified weaknesses of past communication activities. In September 2009 the first evaluation report of Plan D and the closely related “Debate Europe” activities was overall negative. The authors came to the conclusion that “Despite an overall objective of “communicating Europe in partnership”, the EC failed to actively seek synergies for Plan D and Debate Europe, either with other DG, or with the European Parliament, or with Member States‟ initiatives” and “The fact that no clear status was given to the results of the projects prevented even the largest events from contributing to the European decision-making process”.

All this has a lot to say about how 6.5 Million Euro is spend on initiatives that yield such results. But more important than the negative evaluation is the fact that the Lisbon Treaty replaced the Maastricht treaty in December 2009. Almost ten years after the negotiations to modify EU institutions began the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is enforced without a significant something filling this gap between citizens and european policies. It is thus imaginable that the gap between public opinion and public policy is not bridged by the principles other than those who dislike the idea that propaganda is always a means to an end.

Leave a comment

Filed under Europe in Mind

LazyNotes: EU Digital Strategy

Leave a comment

Filed under Europe in Mind